Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to assess the degree of accessibility to divorce in Ukraine under Russian rule during the 19th and early 20th centuries, to identify the legally recognized grounds for marital dissolution, and to compare these formal provisions with the actual ability of spouses to terminate their marriage, as illustrated through specific case studies. The methodology of research is based on a combination of general scientific (analysis, synthesis, generalization, comparison, systematization), special historical methods (historical-structural, historical-comparative, constructive-genetic) with the scientific principles of historicism, objectivity, and systematicity. Scientific novelty of the work lies in the fact that for the first time in Ukrainian historiography, the process of divorce has been considered as a component of the everyday life of different strata of society; specific examples and unique archival materials demonstrate the complexity of divorce from a legal point of view among both the Orthodox and Catholic and Jewish populations of Ukraine under Russian rule; statistical information on the level of divorce among the population of the Russian Empire and other countries of the world has been introduced; the place of the Volhynian Governorate in these processes has been demonstrated. Conclusions. Divorce in Ukraine under Russian rule in the 19th – early 20th centuries was a rare phenomenon, the reasons for which were not only Christian morality, which sharply condemned the act of divorce, but also bureaucratic aspects, strict requirements of legislation, both secular and church. However, at the beginning of the 20th century, against the background of the processes of emancipation and modernization, the proportion of divorces increases, and adultery becomes the main reason for divorce among Orthodox Christians. The power to conduct divorce belonged to the highest church authorities (for Orthodox Christians, to the Holy Synod), and only at the beginning of the 20th century was secular legislation allowed to regulate the act of divorce to a greater extent than before. Nevertheless, the discussion on the transfer of divorce cases to secular authorities, as well as on the liberalization of the divorce process, remained a discussion in the columns of the periodical press of that time until 1917, one of the reasons for which was the church's unwillingness to give up its power. When it was impossible to officially dissolve a marriage, it was necessary to resort to such actions as separation of spouses and bigamy.
References
Bezgin, V. (2020). Povsednevnyi mir russkoi krestianki perioda pozdnei imperii [The Everyday World of a Russian Peasant Woman in the Late Empire]. Moscow : Lomonosov, 248 p.
Borodenko, O. (2019). Shliubna lokatsiia: sproba rekonstruktsiyi istoriy silskyh simey Romenskoho povitu Poltavskoyi huberniyi pershoyi polovyny XIX stolittia [Marriage location: an attempt to reconstruct the histories of rural families in Romny district of the Poltava province in the first half of the 19th century]. Scientific Papers of the Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsyiubynskyi State Pedagogical University Series History, 27, 82-87. https://doi.org/10.31652/2411-2143-2019-27-82-87
Borodenko, O., & Tuchynskyi, V. (2023a). Osoblyvosti vikovyh reyestratsiy ukrayinskoho naselennia za materialamy tserkovnoho ta fiskalnoho obliku druhoyi polovyny XVIII stolittia [Peculiarities of Age Records of the Ukrainian Population Based on the Materials from Church and Financial Accounts of the Second Half of the 18th Century]. Scientific Papers of the Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsyiubynskyi State Pedagogical University Series History, 45, 31-38. https://doi.org/10.31652/2411-2143-2023-45-31-38
Borodenko, O., & Tuchynskyi, V. (2023b). Problema spovidannia ukrayinskym pravoslavnym naselenniam XIX st. (za materialamy spovidnyh rozpysiv Kamianetskoho povitu Podilskoyi huberniyi) [The Confession Problem of the Ukrainian Orthodox Population in the 19th Century (on the Basis of the Confessionals of Kamianetsky District of the Podillia Province)]. Scientific Papers of the Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsyiubynskyi State Pedagogical University Series History, 44, 98-107. https://doi.org/10.31652/2411-2143-2023-44-98-107
Brakorazvodnaia reforma [Divorce reform]. (1912). Kievlianin – Kyivan, 22 avgusta, 2.
Brakorazvodnye dela [Divorce cases]. (1904). Kievlianin – Kyivan, 22 iiunia, 5.
Brakorazvodnye dela [Divorce cases]. (1908). Volyn, 20 dekabria, 1.
Brakorazvodnye dela [Divorce cases]. (1909). Volyn, 22 sentiabria, 1.
DAZhO – Derzhavnyi arkhiv Zhytomytskoii oblasti [State Archives of Zhytomyr Region].
Dorosh, S., Chervonenko, V. (2025). Chomu v Ukrayini kilkist rozluchen nazdoganiae odruzhennia [Why the number of divorces in Ukraine is catching up with marriage]. https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/articles/c15zx1d4v2ko
Dvoezhenets [Bigamist]. (1904). Kievlianin – Kyivan, 12 aprelia, 3.
Dvoezhenstvo [Bigamy]. (1898). Kievlianin – Kyivan, 24 fevralia, 4.
Dvoezhenstvo [Bigamy]. (1910). Kievlianin – Kyivan, 2 aprelia, 4.
Dvoezhenstvo sredi evreev [Bigamy among Jews]. (1910). Kievlianin – Kyivan, 23 dekabria, 4.
Dvumuzhnitsa [Bigamist-woman]. (1911). Kievlianin – Kyivan, 23 noiabria, 3.
Evreiskiy razvod [Jewish divorce]. (1903). Kievlianin – Kyivan, 28 avgusta, 3.
Iatsenko, O. Iu. (2013). Rastorzhenie braka v Rossiyskoy imperii na rubezhe XIX–XX vv. [Divorce in the Russian Empire at the turn of the 19th–20th centuries]. Bulletin of the South Ural Humanitarian University. Series Social and Humanitarian Sciences, vol. 13, № 1, 192-194.
K reforme brakorazvodnogo protsessa [Towards a reform of the divorce process]. (1912). Kievlianin – Kyivan, 26 iiunia, 3.
K voprosu o razvode [On the issue of divorce]. (1909). Kievlianin – Kyivan, 6 ianvaria, 6.
K voprosu o razvode [On the issue of divorce]. (1912а). Kievlianin – Kyivan, 2 avgusta, 2.
K voprosu o razvode [On the issue of divorce]. (1912b). Kievlianin – Kyivan, 6 avgusta, 2.
Kis, O. (2012). Zhinka v tradytsiyniy ukrayinskiy kulturi (druha polovyna XIX – pochatok XX st.) : monohrafiia [Woman in traditional Ukrainian culture (second half of the 19th – beginning of the 20th century): monograph]. Lviv : NAN Ukrayiny, Instytut narodoznavstva, 287 p.
Maximov, V. (1909). Zakony o razvode pravoslavnogo i nepravoslavnogo ispovedaniy i o razdelnom zhitelstve suprugov, s raziasneniem i Pravitelstvuiushchego Senata i tsirkuliarnymi i separatnymi ukazami Sviateishego Sinoda [Laws on divorce of Orthodox and non-Orthodox confessions and on the separate residence of spouses, with an explanation of the Governing Senate and circular and separate decrees of the Holy Synod]. Moscow : Iurist, 428 p.
Mironov, B. N. (2000). Sotsialnaia istoriia Rossii perioda imperii (XVIII – nachalo XX v.) [Social history of Russia during the imperial period (18th – early 20th centuries)]. In 2 volumes, vol. 1. SPb: Izd-vo "Dmitriy Bulanin", 548 p.
N. T. (1902a). Razluchenie suprugov. II [Separation of spouses. II]. Kievlianin - Kyivan, 22 avgusta, 2-3.
N. T. (1902b). Rastorzhenie braka. II [Divorce. II]. Kievlianin – Kyivan, 4 noiabria, 1-2.
Novshestva v brakorazvodnom protsesse [Innovations in divorce proceedings]. (1912). Kievlianin – Kyivan, 26 oktiabria, 1-2.
Obozrenie gazet i zhurnalov [Newspaper and magazine review]. (1904). Iuzhnyi Kray – Southern Region, 27 iiulia, 4.
Pervaia vseobshchaia perepis naseleniia Rossiyskoy imperii, 1897 g. T. VIII. Volynskaia guberniia [The First General Population Census of the Russian Empire, 1897. Vol. 8. Volhynian Governorate]. (1904). SPb : Tip. kn. V. P. Meshcherskogo, 312 p.
Po Ukrayini. Z Kholmshchiny. Ne daiut rozvodiv [Across Ukraine. From Kholmshchyna. They don't give divorces]. (1908). Rada – Council, 6 iiulia (19 lypnia), 2.
Ponomariova, V., Khoroshilova, L. (2009). Mir russkoy zhenshchiny: semia, professiia, domashniy uklad. XVIII – nachalo XX veka [The world of a Russian woman: family, profession, home life. 18th – early 20th century]. Moscow : Novyi khronograf, 352 p.
Ponomariova, V., Khoroshilova, L. (2021). Russkaia zhenshchina: vospitanie, obrazovanie, sudba. XVIII – nachalo XX veka [Russian woman: upbringing, education, destiny. 18th – early 20th century]. Moscow : Lomonosov, 272 s.
Povody k razvodu [Reasons for divorce]. (1913). Kievlianin – Kyivan, 7 fevralia, 3.
Prodazha zheny. (1907). Kievlianin - Kyivan, 13 iiunia, 5.
Prodazha zheny. (1909). Kievlianin - Kyivan, 19 avgusta, 5.
Pushkariova, N. (2020). Chastnaia zhizn russkoy zhenshchiny XVIII veka [The private life of a Russian woman in the 18th century]. Moscow : Lomonosov, 208 p.
Razdelnoe zhitelstvo sviashchennikov s zhenami [Separate residence of priests and their wives]. (1912). Kievlianin – Kyivan, 6 iiunia, 2.
Redkiy brakorazvodnyi protsess [Rare Divorce Case]. (1912). Kievlianin – Kyivan, 10 iiunia, 7.
Svod zakonov Rossiyskoi imperii [Code of Laws of the Russian Empire]. (1857). Zakony grazhdanskie. T. 10, ch. 1, kn. 1. O pravakh i obiazannostiakh semeistvennykh [Civil Laws. Vol. 10, Part 1, Book 1. On the Rights and Duties of Family]. SPb : V Tip. Vtorogo Otdeleniia Sobstvennoi Ego Imperatorskogo Velichestva Kantseliarii, 417 p.
Toltz, M. S. (1977). Brachnost naseleniia Rossii v kontse XIS – nachale XX vv. [Marriage rate of the population of Russia in the late 19th – early 20th centuries]. Brachnost, rozhdaemost, smertnost v Rossii i v SSSR : sb. st. ⁄ A. G. Vyshnevsky (ed.). (pp. 138-153). Moscow : Statistika.
Uslovnye razvody [Conditional divorces]. (1900). Kievlianin – Kyivan, 16 avgusta, 3.
Ustav dukhovnykh konsistoriy [The Charter of Spiritual Consistories]. (1841). Eparkhialnyi sud. Razdel 3, gl. VI. O prekrashchenii i rastorzhenii brakov [Diocesan Court. Section 3, Chapter VI. On the Termination and Dissolution of Marriages]. SPb : V Sinod. tip., 134 p.
Vaniushina, O. V. (2024). "Razdelnaia zhizn suprugov ne daiot im prava vozbuzhdat isk o rastorzhenii braka…": razvody v Rossii v kontse 19 – nachale 20 vekov (po materialam Tverskoi gubernii) ["The separate life of the spouses does not give them the right to bring a lawsuit for dissolution of marriage...": on the issue of divorces in Russia in the late XIX – early XX centuries (based on materials of the Tver province)]. Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series History and Philology, vol. 34, issue 1, 87-96. https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9534-2024-34-1-87-96
Zakonoproekt pro shliubnu rozluku [Divorce Bill]. (1909). Rada – Council, 8 aprilia (21 kvitnia), 2.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Maryna Krugliak