Abstract
The purpose of the work is the theoretical and methodological analysis of the ethno-cultural phenomenon of resilience in the context of traumatic war experience in Ukraine, with an emphasis on the relationship between individual psychological resources and collective cultural meanings that ensure the vitality of the individual and the community. The research methodology is based on systemic, cultural-historical, and phenomenological approaches to studying personality in crisis conditions, the principles of humanistic psychology, and the concepts of psychological resilience (M. Rutter, B. Cyrulnik, A. Masten, M. Ungar) and ethnopsychology. We used methods of theoretical generalisation, content analysis of scientific sources, phenomenological description of cultural displays of resilience, and structural-functional analysis of ethno-cultural mechanisms of adaptation. Scientific novelty lies in revealing ethno-cultural resilience as an integrative phenomenon that combines individual and collective resources of survival; in determining its functions (protective, identifying, integrative, restorative, creative, and communicative) in the context of war trauma; in distinguishing symbolic, linguistic, and creative mechanisms through which culture ensures the psychological resilience of Ukrainiansу. Conclusion. The ethno-cultural resilience of Ukrainians in wartime shows up in their ability to preserve and reproduce cultural meanings even in traumatic situations, turning pain into a resource for spiritual growth. Through language, song, traditions, art, and shared symbols, Ukrainian culture performs therapeutic, restorative, and unifying functions, strengthening the internal resilience of society. Awareness and development of this phenomenon are important for post-war rehabilitation, educational policy, and the preservation of national identity.
References
Hrishyn E. Rezyliientnist osobystosti: sutnist fenomenu, psykhodiahnostyka ta zasoby rozvytku. Visnyk KhNPU imeni H. S. Skovorody "Psykholohyia". 2021. № 64. S. 62–81. URL: https://doi.org/10.34142/23129387.2021.64.04 (data zvernennia: 19.10.2025).
Hrubi T. Rezylientnist yak zaporuka zberezhennia psykhichnoho zdorov’ia osobystosti. Osvita ukrainy v umovakh voiennoho stanu: upravlinnia, tsyfrovizatsiia, yevrointehratsiini aspekty : Zb. tez dop. IV Mizhnar. naukovo-prakt. konf., m. Kyiv, 25 zhovt. 2022 r. S. 227–230.
Mishchenko M. Psykholohichna stiikist (rezylientnist) v umovakh viiny. Modern engineering and innovative technologies. 2023. № 28-02. S. 7–10. URL: https://doi.org/10.30890/2567-5273.2023-28-02-002 (data zvernennia: 19.10.2025).
Walker, F., Pfingst, K., Carnevali, L., Sgoifo, A., Nalivaiko, E. In the search for integrative biomarker of resilience to psychological stress. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2017. Vol. 74. P. 310–320.
Cutuli, J. J., Herbers, J. E., Masten, A. S., Reed, M. G. J. Resilience in development. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology. 3rd ed. 2012.
Fleming, J., Ledogar, R. Resilience, an evolving concept: a review of literature relevant to Aboriginal research. 2008. Vol. 6, № 2. P. 7–23.
Semilit M. V. Etnopsykholohichni osoblyvosti proiektuvannia zhyttievoho shliakhu osobystosti. Problemy politychnoi psykholohii : zb. nauk. prats. 2020. Vyp. 9 (23). S. 255–258.
Pavlenko, V. M. Etnopsykholohiia : pidruch. Kharkiv : KhNU imeni V. N. Karazina, 2019. 448 s.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ульяна Шостак, Наталія Шуй
