Abstract
The article presents a theoretical study of the problem of grieving as a multidimensional process that reveals the experiences of an individual in the event of loss of significant objects, such as loved ones, health or social status. For theoretical consideration, the author proposes to consider classical and modern models of grief, within the framework of a structural approach that defines grief in five successive stages (emotional reactions to loss): shock, denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance. Attention is focused on the key tasks of grieving, including awareness of loss, integration of emotional experience, adaptation to changes and restoration of life prospects. The factors that influence the intensity and duration of the process, including individual characteristics, social support and the nature of the loss, are analysed. The differences between normative and complicated grieving, which require different approaches to psychological support, are identified. Particular attention is paid to the role of social ties and support in reducing the emotional burden of grieving. The importance of professional psychological assistance in cases of complicated grieving is emphasised. The necessity of integrating the experience of loss into the life history of a person as a key stage in overcoming the consequences of grief is substantiated. Recommendations for optimising psychological support for bereaved persons are proposed. It is concluded that an individual approach to support is important, considering the specifics of emotional response and life circumstances.
A brief overview of foreign grief theories is provided. The phenomenon of grief as a natural reaction to loss is considered. T. Komar's point of view is a synthesis of relational theories in a broad sense, and is also based on attachment theory, modern research on the loss of a loved one, and personality development theory. The article pays special attention to the psychological features of normal and prolonged grief.
References
Voitovych M.V. Psykholohichni osoblyvosti horiuvannia.Aktualni problemy psykholohii. Tom V. Vypusk 19. 2020. S. 10-20
Vlasenko A., Vinnyk Perezhyvannia vtrat: spetsyfika, konflikt, transtendentsiia, podolannia. Teoriia i praktyka suchasnoi psykholohii . 2019 r., № 3, T. 1.S.33-37.
Sussillo, M. (2005) Beyond the grave—adolescent parental loss: “Letting go” and “holding on”. 2005, Psychoanalytic Dialogues,15(4): 499-527.
Stolorow, R. D. (2007). Trauma and human existence: Autobiographical,psychoanalytic, and philosophical reflections. New York: Analytic Press.
Stroebe, M. & Schut. The dual process model of coping with bereavement: a decade on. Omega. 2010; 61(4): 273-89.
Weinburger, A. and Possick, C. (2024). Parenting following the death of a child in war or terror attack: Hyper-Enfranchised loss”. Journal of Loss and Trauma. 2/12/2024,1-22. Open Access: Full PDF published online by using Google with the paper title,
Freud, S. (Mourning and melancholia. Standard Edition, 14:237–258. London: Hogarth (1917). Press, 1957
Еlyzabet Kiubler-Ross. O smerty y umyranyy [Эlektronnыi resurs] - M., Sofyia. – 2001. – Rezhym dostupa k resursu http://www.ereading.club/bookreader.php/94233/Kyubler-Ross__O_smerti_i_umiranii.html
Neimeyer, R. Widowhood, grief, and the quest for meaning: A narrative perspective on resilience. In: Carr, Nesse, and Wortman, 2006, Spousal Bereavement in Life. NY: Springer. PDF Free Access.
Rothschild, B. (2003). The body remembers: The psychophysiology of trauma and trauma treatment. New York, NY: Norton.
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Тетяна Комар, Олена Бессараба