Relationship between the group`s self-assessment indicators and the performance indicators of the women`s and man`s volleyball teams
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31652/2071-5285-2019-7-26-147-153Keywords:
joint activity, regulation, interaction, density of links.Abstract
The relevance of research. The study of qualitative characteristics of the joint activity of sports teams to improve sports results is an actual direction of scientific and practical activity of the field of sports pedagogy and psychology. Of particular i nterest, in our opinion, is the study of the group's effectiveness of the sports team as a generalizing concept, which allows to some extent integrate the meaning of individual group phenomena relating to the aspects of evaluation and regulation of joint sports activities. The purpose. Determination of the relationship between the indicators of group self-esteem and the performance indicators of women's and men's volleyball teams in the preparatory period at the stage of specialized basic training. The studywas attended by 87 athletes volleyball men and women teams. To solve the problems, a set of methods was used: analysis and generalization of scientific and methodical literature; questioning and psychodiagnostic testing; Methods of mathematical statisticsfor calculating rs Spearman rank coefficients. Research findings and key findings. In the course of the study, a correlation analysis of each of the qualitative indicators of group self-esteem with an assessment of the intensity of the performance of the performance indicators of women's and men's volleyball teams in the preparatory period was carried out. The data we have received show that correlation relations between the indicators of group self-esteem and group effectiveness are recorded in men's volleyball teams (33) in women's teams (7). Such differences are a possible basis for the lack of means for regulating the joint activity of athletes of women's volleyball teams and their belief in their own ability to organize and perform joint actions that are necessary to achieve the result.
References
Бандура А. Теория социального научения; пер. с англ. Санкт-Петербург: Евразия, 2000. 320 с.
Войтенко С.М. Психолого-педагогічні засоби регуляції спільної діяльності спортивних команд із різним типом взаємодії: дис. ... канд. наук з фіз. виховання і спорту: 24.00.01. ЛДУФК. Львів, 2017. 227 с.
Журавлев А.Л. Психология совместной деятельности. Москва: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2005. 640 с.
Козина Ж.Л., Ермаков С.С., Погорелова А.О. Методологические основы определения индивидуальных особенностей волейболисток на этапе специализированной базовой подготовки. Физическое воспитание студентов; научный журнал. Харьков: ХОВНОКУ – ХГАДИ, 2012. No3. С. 53 – 61.
Колосов А.Б., Войтенко С.М. Психометрична адаптація опитувальника групової ефективності спортивної команди. Актуальні проблеми фізичної культури і спорту. 2014. Вип. 32 (4). С. 46 – 51.
Родионов А.В. Психология физического воспитания и спорта: учебник. Москва: Академпроект, 2004. 576 с.
Уэйнберг Р.С., Гоулд Д. Основы психологи спорта и физической культуры. Киев: Олимп. лит. 1998. 336 с.
Шеріф Сархан. Соціально-психологічні особливості групової згуртованості спортсменів. Спортивний вісник Придніпров’я: зб. наук. праць. Дніпропетровськ, 2011. No2. С. 75 – 79.
Carron A.V., Bray S.R., Eys M.A. Team cohesion and team success in sport. Journal of Sport Sciences. 2002. N. 20. Р. 119–126.
George T.R., Feltz D.L. Motivation in sport from a collective efficacy perspective. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 1995. Vol. 26. Р. 98 – 116.
Hodges L., Carron A.V. Collective efficacy and group performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 1992. Vol.23, Р. 48 – 59.
Iancheva T., Jordanov V. Рsychological skills and game efficacy with basketball players. Olympic Sports and Sport for All: XVI International Scientific and VI International Scientific Congress, 17 – 19 May 2012. Р. 351 – 354.
Jowett S. Coach-athlete relationships ignite groupness. In Group Dynamics Advances in Sport and Exercise Psychology. New York: Routledge, 2007. Р. 63 – 77.
Lirgg C.D., Feltz D.L., Chase M.A. Relationships of individual and collective efficacy to team performance. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology. 1994. Vol. 16. Р. 142 – 148.
Martinez J.R., Guillen F., & Feltz D.L. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Collective Efficacy Questionnaire for Sports, Psicothema. 2011. Vol. 23, N 3. P. 503 – 509.
Myers N.D., Payment C.A., Feltz D.L. Reciprocal relationships between collective efficacy and team performance in women’s ice hockey, group dynamics, Theory, Research and Practice. 2004. Vol. 8, N 3. P. 182 – 195.
Ramzaninezhad R., Keshtan M.H., Shahamat M.D. The relationship between collective efficacy, group cohesion and team performance in professional volleyball teams, Brazilian Journal Biomotricity. 2009. Vol. 3, N 1. Р. 31 – 39.
Watson C.B., Chemers M.M., Preiser N. Collective efficacy: A multilevel analysis, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2001. Vol 27, N 1057. P. 1068.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Войтенко Сергій

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.