Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of new approaches to solving the urgent problem of increasing the efficiency of processing the source base of scientific research results in the field of social sciences, in particular Pedagogy, in modern conditions of expansion of the research opportunities spectrum due to digitalization. The authors give a comprehensive description and present a holistic juxtaposition comparison of the five most common types of scientific literature review in pedagogical science: narrative, systematic, semi-systematic, integrative, and meta-analysis based. Having analyzed the Ukrainian and foreign scientists’ works on the problem under investigation, the authors found out the peculiarities of the new methodology of searching and analyzing the results of existing pedagogical research. The purpose of the study was to develop methodological recommendations for the implementation of various strategies and approaches to the scientific literature review as an effective and fruitful research method in the study of educational problems. Researchers have proven that under the influence of digitalization processes, not only the paradigm of scientific research is gradually changing, but also significant changes are being made in the methodology of carrying out a scientific literature review. These positive changes have made the process much faster, more convenient and more accurate. Modern search tools allow a researcher to focus on analyzing the content of information, significantly reducing the technical burden associated with searching and organizing data.
References
Biesta, G. (2010). Why “What Works” Still Won’t Work: From Evidence-Based Education to Value-Based Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(5), 491-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x
Chepak, V. V. (2011). Theoretical and Methodological Basis of Genesis and Development of the Sociology of Education. [in Ukrainian].
Davis, J., Mengersen, K., Bennett, S., & Mazerolle, L. (2014). Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses. SpringerPlus, 3, Article 511, https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-511
Gaw, A. (2021). Writing an Effective Abstract. A Study Guide.
Goncharenko, S. U. (2008). Pedagogical Studies. Methodological Advice to Junior Researchers. [in Ukrainian].
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Hrykov, E. M. (2015). Analysis of the State of Research of a Scientific Problem in the Field of Comparative Pedagogy. Ukrainian Pedagogical Journal, 4, 57-64. [in Ukrainian].
Kennedy, M. M. (2007). Defining a Literature: What Are the Rules? Educational Researcher, 36(3), 139-147.
Kolomiiets, A., & Gromov, I. (2018). Development of the Undergraduates’ Foreign Language Competency as a Factor of Europeanization of Higher Pedagogical Education System of Ukraine. Ridna Shkola, 9-12, 15-20. [in Ukrainian].
Kolomiiets, A. M., & Gromov, I. V. (2017). Netnographic Analysis of Pedagogical Investigations Subject Spectrum of Periodical Journals Which Are Indexed in Scopus Scientometric Database. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 59(3), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v59i3.1666
Kolomiiets, A. M., Gromov, I. V., Kolomiiets, L. I., Suprun, M. V., Knysh, T.V., & Hnatiuk, N.Y. (2021). University Degree and Citizen Science: the Necessity for Promotion of the Latter and the Possibilities of Its Organization in the Teachers Professional Training. The New Educational Review, 64(2), 175-187. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.21.64.2.14
Liberati, A., Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P.C., & Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 65, https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00136
MacInnis, D. J. (2011). A Framework for Conceptual Contributions in Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 136-154. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman D.G. (2009a). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 264-269, https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009b). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Ogneviuk, V. O. (2009). Philosophy of Education within the Structure of Scientific Studies of the Education Phenomenon. Schliakh osvity, 54(4), 2-6. [in Ukrainian].
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Suri, H. (2020). Ethical Considerations of Conducting Systematic Reviews in Educational Research. Research Ethics, 16(1-2), 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_3
Sysoieva, S. O. (2012). Sphere of Education as an Object of Research. Oswitologia, 1, 22-29. [in Ukrainian].
Sysoieva, S. O., & Krystopchuk, T. Y. (2013). Methodology of Scientific Research. [in Ukrainian].
Torraco, R.J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 356-367, https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207-222, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Ward, V., House, A., & Hamer, S. (2009). Developing a Framework for Transferring Knowledge into Action: A Thematic Analysis of the Literature. Journal of health services research & policy, 14, 156-164. https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2009.008120
Webster, J., & Watson, R.T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 26, 3. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4132319
Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, &, Pawson, J. R. (2013). RAMESES publication standards: Meta-narrative reviews. BMC Medicine, 11, Article 20, https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-20
Zavgorodnia, T. K., & Strazhnikova, I. V. (2021). Methodological Basis of the Pedagogical Studies. [in Ukrainian].
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Коломієць, А., Громов, Є.