The origin and activity of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi until 1648 in the interpretation of Russian historians
pdf (Ukrainian)

How to Cite

Stepanchuk, Y., & Prylypko, R. (2019). The origin and activity of Bohdan Khmelnytskyi until 1648 in the interpretation of Russian historians. Scientific Papers of the Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsyiubynskyi State Pedagogical University Series History, 30, 85-92. https://doi.org/10.31652/2411-2143-2019-30-85-92

Abstract

Bohdan Khmelnytsky is the most popular figure in the Russian historiography. The Ukrainian hetman most often had been attracting the attention of scientists, becoming the object of various studies and ideological manipulations. B. Khmelnytsky also firmly entered the historical memory of the Russians as a compulsory and significant component of it. His image is easily remembered in the general public, inevitably associated with positive historical characters.

The article analyzes contemporary Russian historiography on the origin and activity of Bohdan Khmelnytsky until 1648. It was emphasized that the Russian traditionalists gravitate to the exaltation of B. Khmelnytsky, who, in their opinion, has carried out a global historical mission on a planetary scale – «brought Ukraine under the «high royal hand»». At the same time, the modernizers are looking for the origin, upbringing, social environment and character traits of B. Khmelnytsky in support of the deprivation of the pro-Moscow orientation of explanations of his political concepts.

Contemporary Russian historiographical images of the hetman – traditionnalist and modernizing are based on fundamentally similar interpretations of B. Khmelnytsky’s life before the Ukrainian National Liberation War. This shows well how much the conceptual shell plays in Russian historiography when interpreting the base material.

The origin of B. Khmelnitsky and his activity until 1648 became those topics that the representatives of both camps of Russian historiography could not get past. Both here and there they are trying to bring their concepts to the ground or to support them with appeals to the «pre-war» period of the hetman’s life.

pdf (Ukrainian)

References

Антоненко С. Богдан Хмельницкий (1595–1667) // Родина. 1999. No 8.С. 68.

Евлахов А. Хмельницкий и Мазепа. Мифы и факты воссоединения // Власть. 2006. No 10. С.79–87.

Качмарчик Я. Гетьман Богдан Хмельницький. Перемишль; Львів, 1996. 328 с.

Маслак В. Ранньомодерна українська державність очима сучасних польських таросійських істориків. Кам’янець-Подільський, 2014. 354 с.

Рогожин Н. М., Санин Г. А.Россия и Украина в XVI–XVIII вв. // История и историки Историографический вестик.2004. Москва: Наука, 2005. С. 332–342.

Санин Г. Богдан Хмельницкий и Иван Мазепа //Труды Института Российской истории РАН. Вып. 6. Москва: ИРИ РАН, 2006. С. 65–90.

Смолій В., Степанков В. Богдан Хмельницький. Соціально-політичний портрет. Третє доопрацьоване видання. Київ: Tempora, 2009. 680 с.

Таирова-Яковлева Т. Г. Проблемынеоднородности украинского казачестваи внутренние противоречия их идеалов. Войско запорожское и Запорожье // Украина и соседние государства в XVIIвеке: материалы Междунар. конф. СПб., 2004. С. 203–213.

Таирова-Яковлева Т. Г. Гетманы Украины. Истории о славе, трагедиях и мужестве. Москва: Издательство Центрполиграф, 2011. 470.

Флоря Б. Н. Спорные проблемы русско-украинских отношений в первой половине и середине XVII в. // Белоруссия и Украина. История и культура.Ежегодник 2003 / Глав. ред. Б.Флоря. Москва: «Индрик», 2003. С. 29–40.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Scientific Papers of the Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University. Series: History

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.