Дискурсивні маркери в корпоративних звітах про зміну клімату Банку Англії: кількісний аналіз

Олександр Капранов

doi:10.31652/2521-1307-2024-39-05

Authors

Oleksandr Kapranov

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31652/2521-1307-2024-39-05

Keywords:

corporate discourse, climate change discourse, computer-assisted study, discourse markers

Abstract

The issue of climate change is one of the fundamental problems that the humanity faces and needs to overcome (Gjerstad & Fløttum, 2021; Kapranov, 2022). One of the ways of overcoming the negative consequences of climate change is to inform the public at large and other relevant stakeholders of the measures to mitigate it. In this regard, it should be observed that financial institutions and, in particular, The Bank of England, which is considered a leading financial institution worldwide, inform their stakeholders of the measures they undertake in climate change mitigation and/or amelioration. Importantly, however, it is pivotal to examine what financial institutions do in order to mitigate the current climate crisis and how they communicate their climate change-related activities to the stakeholders. In this light, the article presents a quantitative study whose purpose is to identify and quantify the most frequent discourse markers (further – DMs) in corporate disclosures on the issue of climate change published by The Bank of England. To that end, the study employs a quantitative methodology of the frequency analysis afforded by the computer program AntConc (Anthony, 2022). The program is applied to a corpus of The Bank of England’s climate change disclosures published from 2020 to 2024 in order to calculate the frequency of the occurrence of DMs. In addition, the data garnered by AntConc (Anthony, 2022) are processed in Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 (IMB, 2011) in order to calculate means and standard deviations of the DMs under consideration. The results of the quantitative analysis show that the most frequent DMs in the corpus are and, as, and such. The results are further interpreted in the study through the prism of the approach to DMs formulated by Fraser (2015), who considers the following three types of DMs, namely (І) contrastive, (ІІ) implicative, and (ІІІ) elaborative. Informed by Fraser’s (2015) classification of DMs, the results of the study indicate that the types of elaborative and implicative DMs occur frequently, whilst the occurrence of the contrastive DMs is infrequent in the corpus. These findings are interpreted in the study as a pragmatic strategy of The Bank of England that consists in clarifying, commenting, and specifying climate-change related content, as well as providing indirect information about it rather than communicating climate change-related issues by means of referring to contrastive discursive devices, such as the contrastive DMs (for instance, but, however, yet, etc.). The novelty of the study consists in investigating an under-researched phenomenon of the frequency of DMs in climate change disclosures by The Bank of England. The relevance of the study is as follows. The issue of climate change poses innumerable challenges that are experienced by ordinary people as well as corporate actors (Kapranov, 2022, 2023) and the way The Bank of England reacts to this issue linguistically and discursively, inclusive of the use of DMs, provides an example of how climate change can be addressed by the leading financial institutions. The results of the present study, therefore, can serve as a direction for future research into the best practices of climate change communication by Anglophone corporate and financial actors.

Author Biography

Oleksandr Kapranov

PhD, associate professor, NLA University College (Oslo, Norway)

References

Alexander, R. (2010). Framing Discourse on the Environment: A Critical Discourse Approach. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203890615

Anthony, L. (2022). AntConc Version 4.0.11. Tokyo: Waseda University.

Aversa, D. (2023). Climate change and climate-related financial disclosures in the banking sector. Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets & Institutions, 13(1), 70-94. https://doi.org/10.22495/rgcv13i1p6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22495/rgcv13i1p6

Bailey, D. (2024). ‘Building back better’ or sustaining the unsustainable? The climate impacts of Bank of England QE in the Covid-19 pandemic. British Politics, 19(1), 134-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-022-00223-w

Bazzanella, C., & Miecznikowski, J. (2009). Central/peripheral functions of allora and ‘overall pragmatic configuration’: a diachronic perspective. In M.-Br. Mosegaard Hansen & J. Visconti (eds.) Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics (pp. 107-121). Bingley: Emerald. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253216_007

Bhatia, V. K. (2008). Towards critical genre analysis. In V. Bhatia, J. Flowerdew, & R. H. Jones (eds.) Advances in Discourse Studies (pp. 176-187). London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203892299

Bhatia, V. K. (2023). Critical genre analysis of professional discourse. In M. Handford & J. P. Gee (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 358-372). London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035244-29

Breeze, R. (2015). Corporate Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.

Breeze, R. (2018). Researching evaluative discourse in Annual Reports using semantic tagging. Ibérica, (35), 41-66.

Bruce, I. (2014). Enacting criticality in corporate disclosure communication: The genre of the fund manager commentary. International Journal of Business Communication, 51(4), 315-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414525441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414525441

Camiciottoli, B. C. (2010). Discourse connectives in genres of financial disclosure: Earnings presentations vs. earnings releases. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(3), 650-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.07.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.07.007

Camiciottoli, B. (2013). Rhetoric in Financial Discourse: A Linguistic Analysis of ICT-Mediated Disclosure Genres. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401210102_003

Cormier, D., Ledoux, M. J., & Magnan, M. (2009). The use of Web sites as a disclosure platform for corporate performance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 10(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2008.04.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2008.04.002

Di Ferrante, L. (2021). Transitioning between small talk and work talk through discourse markers: Evidence from a workplace spoken corpus. Brno Studies in English, 47(2), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2021-2-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2021-2-2

Fox Tree, J. E. (2015). Discourse markers in writing. Discourse Studies, 17(1), 64-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614557758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445614557758

Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 931-952. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00101-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00101-5

Fraser, B. (2015). The combining of discourse markers – A beginning. Journal of Pragmatics, 86, 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.007

Fuoli, M. (2018). Building a trustworthy corporate identity: A corpus-based analysis of stance in annual and corporate social responsibility reports. Applied Linguistics, 39(6), 846-885. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw058

Furkó, B.P. (2013). The functional spectrum of pragmatic markers in political news interviews and celebrity interviews. Topics in Linguistics, 11, 13-21.

Garzone, G. (2020). Sharing Professional Knowledge on Web 2.0 and Beyond: Discourse and Genre. Mialno: Edizioni Universitarie.

Gjerstad, Ø., & Fløttum, K. (2021). Climate change lifestyle narratives among Norwegian citizens: A linguistic analysis of survey discourse. European Policy Analysis, 7, 386-404. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1122

Hope, W. (2024). The Anthropocene, Global Capitalism and Global Futures: Times Out of Joint. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63600-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63600-4

Hussain, S. S., Ali, A. M., Kasim, Z. M., & Jalaluddin, I. (2020). A review on the rhetorical structure and linguistic features of corporate annual reports. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(9), 236-256. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i9/7591 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i9/7591

Hyland, K. (1998a). Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO’s letter. The Journal of Business Communication, 35(2), 224-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369803500203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369803500203

Hyland, K. (1998b). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(4), 437-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5

IBM. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 20.0. New York: IBM Corp.

Jackson, J. & Bailey, D. (2024). “Facilitating the transition to net zero” and institutional change in the Bank of England: Perceptions of the environmental mandate and its policy implications within the British state. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 26(2), 343-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481231189382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481231189382

Jaworska, S. (2020). Corporate discourse. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou-Nunes (eds.) Handbook of Discourse Studies (pp. 666–686). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108348195.031

Kapranov, O. (2015a). Conceptual metaphors in Ukrainian prime ministers’ discourse involving renewables. Topics in Linguistics, 16(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2015-0007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2015-0007

Kapranov, O. (2015b). Do international corporations speak in one voice on the issue of global climate change: The case of British Petroleum and The Royal Dutch Shell Group. In C. Can, A. Kilimci, & K. Papaja (eds.) Social Sciences and Humanities: A Global Perspective (pp. 306-322). Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.

Kapranov, O. (2016). Corpus analysis of discourse markers in corporate reports involving climate change. EPiC Series in Language and Linguistics, 1, 216-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29007/qxsg

Kapranov, O. (2017). The framing of climate change discourse by Shell and the framing of Shell’s climate change related activities by the Economist and the Financial Times. Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies, 7, 55-69. https://doi.org/ 10.15845/bells.v7i0.1088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v7i0.1088

Kapranov, O. (2018a). Conceptual metaphors associated with climate change. In R. Augustyn & A. Mierzwinska-Hajnos (eds.) New Insights into the Language and Cognition Interface (pp. 51-66). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Kapranov, O. (2018b). Shell’s image of climate change and its representations in the British financial press. In G. E. Garzone & W. Giordano (eds.) Discourse, Communication and the Enterprise: Where Business Meets Language (pp. 392-409). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Kapranov, O. (2019). Discourse markers in writing on Facebook by early balanced English/Italian bilinguals. Brno Studies in English, 45(2), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2019-2-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2019-2-4

Kapranov, O. (2022). The syntax of climate change: Syntactic means in the construction of Greta Thunberg’s community identity on Facebook. Studia UBB Philologia, 67(4), 15-33. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2022.4.01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2022.4.01

Kapranov, O. (2023). Throwing soup at Van Gogh: The framing of art in climate change activism by British mass media. Discourses on Culture, 19(1), 175-200. https://doi.org/10.2478/doc-2023-0008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/doc-2023-0008

Karl, T. R., & Trenberth, K. E. (2003). Modern global climate change. Science, 302(5651), 1719-1723. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1090228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1090228

Liu, S., & Zhang, J. (2021). Using metadiscourse to enhance persuasiveness in corporate press releases: a corpus-based study. SAGE Open, 11(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211032165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211032165

Nowiski, N. (2018). Rising above the storm: Climate risk disclosure and its current and future relevance to the energy sector. Energy LJ, 39, 1-46.

O’Brien, K. (2012). Global environmental change II: From adaptation to deliberate transformation. Progress in Human Geography, 36(5), 667-676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511425767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511425767

Povolná, R. (2012). Causal and contrastive discourse markers in novice academic writing. Brno Studies in English, 38(2), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2012-2-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/BSE2012-2-8

Qian, Y. (2020). A critical genre analysis of MD&A discourse in corporate annual reports. Discourse & Communication, 14(4), 424-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481320910525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481320910525

Rajandran, K. (2019). Multimodal CSR disclosure in Malaysian corporate websites. Pertanika Journal of Socail Sciences & Humanities, 27(2), 787-801.

Ruiz-Garrido, M. F., Fortanet-Gómez, I., & Palmer-Silveira, J.C. (2011). Introducing British and Spanish companies to investors. In J. Artiz & R. C. Walker (eds.) Discourse Perspectives on Organizational Communication (pp. 159-178). Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841

Schiffrin, D. (2005). Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 54-75). Malden/Oxford: Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753460.ch4

Shil, N. C., & Chowdhury, A. (2018). Is sustainability reporting in public sector a fashion or legitimation? An isomorphic interpretation. The Cost and Management, 46(2), 14-26.

Swales, J. M. (2004). Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge: University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827

The Bank of England. (2022). The Bank of England’s Climate-Related Financial Disclosure 2023. Available at https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/prudential-regulation/publication/2022/june/the-bank-of-englands-climate-related-financial-disclosure-2022. Accessed 01.11.2024.

The Bank of England. (2023). The Bank of England’s Climate-Related Financial Disclosure 2023. Available at https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/climate-change/the-bank-of-englands-climate-related-financial-disclosure-2023. Accessed 01.11.2024.

The Bank of England. (2024). The Bank of England’s Climate-Related Financial Disclosure 2024. Available at https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/climate-change/the-bank-of-englands-climate-related-financial-disclosure-2024. Accessed 01.11.2024.

Thuiller, W. (2007). Climate change and the ecologist. Nature, 448(7153), 550-552. https://doi.org/10.1038/448550a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/448550a

Vestrelli, R., Colladon, A. F., & Pisello, A. L. (2024). When attention to climate change matters: The impact of climate risk disclosure on firm market value. Energy Policy, 185, 113938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113938

Williams, C. (2008). Toward a taxonomy of corporate reporting strategies. Journal of Business Communication, 45(3), 232-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943608317520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943608317520

Yeung, L. (2007). In search of commonalities: Some linguistic and rhetorical features of business reports as a genre. English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), 156-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.06.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.06.004