Non-professional physical education of the individual in higher education: conceptual foundations, educational mission, and development prospects

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31652/3041-2463/2026-3-5

Keywords:

non-professional physical education of the individual, physical education, higher education institutions, competence-based approach, general competencies, physical literacy, health literacy, lifelong physical activity, life viability, personality subjectivity

Abstract

Topicality. The relevance of the study is determined by the need to rethink the educational mission of Physical Education in higher education institutions under the conditions of competence-based transformation of the modern university, the spread of sedentary lifestyles, increasing psycho-physical burdens, and the growing necessity to develop individuals capable of maintaining health, work capacity, and physical activity throughout life regardless of their chosen profession. Under contemporary conditions, the contradiction between the predominantly time-limited educational influence of traditional physical education and the need to prepare a person for the independent organization of physical culture and health-related activities throughout life becomes increasingly evident. This actualizes the search for new pedagogical approaches related to the formation of non-professional physical education of the individual (NPPE). The purpose of the study is to provide a theoretical and methodological substantiation of non-professional physical education of the individual as a new direction for the development of Physical Education in higher education institutions, to determine its conceptual logic, educational mission, pedagogical content, and potential for developing universal life-related competencies among higher education students. Material and methods of the research. The methodological basis of the study included the provisions of competence-based, human-centered, systemic, and anthropological approaches, as well as the concepts of lifelong learning, health literacy, physical literacy, pedagogical innovation, and personality subjectivity. The study employed methods of analysis, systematization, and generalization of scientific literature, comparative pedagogical analysis, conceptual modeling, theoretical synthesis, and pedagogical interpretation. Results of the research. It has been established that, under the conditions of competence-based modernization of higher education, Physical Education acquires the potential to rethink its educational mission as a field for developing universal competencies related to a person’s ability for physical culture self-regulation, health maintenance, organization of physical activity, and lifelong viability. It has been substantiated that NPPE does not negate the traditional system of physical education but serves as a pedagogical continuation and expansion of its possibilities in accordance with the modern logic of general competencies. It has been shown that Physical Education possesses a unique potential for integrating knowledge, practice, personal experience, corporeality, self-observation, and physical culture activity of the individual. Prospective directions for NPPE implementation have been identified, including the renewal of the professional role of the physical education teacher, the creation of an appropriate educational environment, pedagogical design of implementation mechanisms, and expert evaluation of the feasibility of innovative models. Conclusions. It has been proved that non-professional physical education of the individual can be considered a promising direction for the transformation of Physical Education in higher education institutions aimed at developing an individual’s ability to maintain personal health, work capacity, psycho-physical balance, and physical activity throughout life. Strengthening the role of Physical Education in the modern university is associated not with professional competition among disciplines but with its capacity to ensure a universal component of educational outcomes equally significant for representatives of all specialties.

Author Biographies

  • Prykhodko Volodymyr, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technology

    Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor

  • Tomenko Oleksandr, A. S. Makarenko Sumy State Pedagogical University

    Doctor of Science in Physical Education and Sports, Professor

References

1. Кремень, В. Г. (2023). Філософія людиноцентризму у системі сучасних цінностей. Вісник Національної академії педагогічних наук України, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.37472/v.naes.2023.5126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37472/v.naes.2023.5126

2. Приходько, В. (2023). Будівництво власного здоров'я (організаційно-педагогічні аспекти). Інновація.

3. Приходько, В., Салов, В., Чернігівська, С., Вілянський, В., & Кравченко, К. (2021). Реформа фізичного виховання майбутніх бакалаврів у вітчизняній вищій школі (компетентнісний підхід) (2-ге вид.). Інновація.

4. Приходько, В., Томенко, О., & Чернігівська, С. (2022). Освітні ефекти фізичної культури. Інновація.

5. Рашкевич, Ю. М. (2014). Болонський процес та нова парадигма вищої освіти. Видавництво Львівської політехніки.

6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Sage Publications.

7. Cairney, J., Dudley, D., Kwan, M., Bulten, R., & Kriellaars, D. (2019). Physical literacy, physical activity and health: Toward an evidence-informed conceptual model. Sports Medicine, 49(3), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01063-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01063-3

8. Casey, A., Kirk, D., & MacPhail, A. (2021). Pedagogical cases in physical education and youth sport. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003025429 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003025429

9. Edwards, L. C., Bryant, A. S., Keegan, R. J., Morgan, K., & Jones, A. M. (2017). Definitions, foundations and associations of physical literacy: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 47(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0560-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0560-7

10. Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.

11. Haerens, L., Kirk, D., Cardon, G., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2011). Toward the development of a pedagogical model for health-based physical education. Quest, 63(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2011.10483684 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2011.10483684

12. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.

13. Harris, A. (2002). Leading educational change and school improvement. Educational Management Administration, & Leadership, 30(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X020301002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X020301002

14. International Physical Literacy Association. (2017). The International Physical Literacy Association position statement. IPLA. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336652302_Physical_literacy_a_concept_analysis

15. Keating, X. D., Harrison, L., Chen, L., Guan, J., & Dauenhauer, B. (2009). Urban minority ninth-grade students' health literacy and their health behaviors. American Journal of Health Education, 40(4), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2009.10599095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2009.10599616

16. Nutbeam, D., & Lloyd, J. E. (2021). Understanding and responding to health literacy as a social determinant of health. Annual Review of Public Health, 42, 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102529

17. OECD. (2013). Innovative learning environments. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264203488-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264203488-en

18. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

19. Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society. Hogrefe, & Huber Publishers.

20. UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707.locale=en

21. Whitehead, M. (2010). Physical literacy: Throughout the lifecourse. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203881903

22. Whitehead, M. (2019). Physical literacy across the world. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203702697 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203702697

23. Winterton, J., Delamare-Le Deist, F., & Stringfellow, E. (2006). Typology of knowledge, skills and competences: Clarification of the concept and prototype. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

24. World Health Organization. (2021). Health promotion glossary of terms 2021. WHO. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240038349

Published

2026-10-14

Issue

Section

Physical culture, physical education of different population groups

How to Cite

Non-professional physical education of the individual in higher education: conceptual foundations, educational mission, and development prospects. (2026). Actual Problems of Physical Education and Methods of Sports Training, 3, 78-98. https://doi.org/10.31652/3041-2463/2026-3-5

Similar Articles

1-10 of 105

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.